[ Vendor quote leveling ]

Level the quotes your vendors send.

Reconcile each stated total to its own line items. Price exclusions as scope. This is trade-contractor RFQ leveling, not a general contractor shopping subs.

Book a live demo

Your vendors, one scope.

The status quo is a last-hour workbook that trusts cover totals. ArosBid levels as the quotes arrive.

Your vendors, one scope.
On the deskArosBidManual leveling
Whose quotesThe equipment, gear, and specialty quotes a trade contractor collects against one scope.Often a GC lining up subcontractor bids. That is a different sheet.
Stated total vs itemized sumInteger-cent code recomputes the sum and surfaces the delta. It does not silently “fix” the cover.The cover number is trusted because there is no time to add the lines.
ExclusionsLifted out of the fine print and treated as scope lines so the comparison is the same job.Read if someone has twenty quiet minutes. Usually they do not.
When it happensAs quotes land. The sheet is live before the last hour.A workbook built twenty minutes before close, when nine PDFs arrive at once.
Money modelDeterministic integer-cent arithmetic. The model reads the PDF. Code does the math.A spreadsheet formula that may or may not include the last revision row.
AwardA recommendation the estimator can accept, change, or ignore. Nothing sends from this sheet.Whoever’s total looks lowest on the tab that was finished last.

What you can check on a walkthrough.

Three claims that are architecture, not a pitch. None of them is a customer story we do not have.

  1. 01The total is not the sum

    A stated grand total and the vendor’s own itemization can disagree. ArosBid shows both numbers and the difference. Which figure is right is a conversation with the vendor.

  2. 02Exclusions are scope

    Startup labor, a short warranty, freight, factory test. None of those change the printed total. All of them change what the job costs. Leveling prices them as lines.

  3. 03Money is code

    No language model adds the column. Integer cents, the same way every time, checkable by hand. Isolated instance. Entra ID. The estimator still awards.

Whose sheet this is

On a general contractor desk, “leveling” usually means lining up subcontractor bids against each other. That is not this page, and it is not the AI bid leveling hub either. Both pages are the trade-contractor problem: the quotes your equipment, gear, and specialty vendors send against one scope you already took off.

Nine PDFs in the last hour. Each excluding a different line. Each with a cover total that may not match its own itemization. That sheet is why a correct takeoff still becomes a wrong number. ArosBid includes takeoff and estimate and replaces Trimble AutoBid. This page is the next sheet: the commercial quotes that arrive once those quantities exist.

The cover is not the proof

A vendor’s stated grand total and the sum of its own line items can disagree. Sometimes the gap is rounding. Sometimes a revision hit a line and missed the cover. Sometimes a spreadsheet range was off by one row for months and this is the first quote where the difference is large enough to see. Nobody has to be dishonest for that to cost you a number you cannot defend at buyout.

Arithmetic is not a judgment call, so ArosBid does not hand it to a model. Integer-cent code recomputes the sum and surfaces the delta. The $500,000 mismatch used in the walkthrough is labeled fictional demo data, the same family as Riverside Office Tower. The job is to have the conversation with the vendor before you submit, not during buyout.

ArosBid does not silently correct the vendor’s total. Both numbers stay visible. Which figure is right is their signature, not ours. Read The total is not the sum for the arithmetic argument. This page is the desk that runs it.

Empty conference table after hours. No screens.

Read the exclusions before the number

The cheapest quote on the table is frequently the one that excluded the most. Startup labor, a warranty a year short of the spec, freight, factory test. None of those change the printed total. All of them change what the job costs. Leaving scope off a quote does not delete it from the job. It moves it to whoever failed to notice.

Leveling treats exclusions as scope lines so the comparison is the same job. The value attached to a gap is a starting point for a vendor conversation, not a substitute for one. The same discipline runs forward into your proposal: what you send should state what you actually carried. Field note: Read the exclusions before you read the number.

The model reads. Code adds.

Finding the itemization in a PDF some estimating package generated in 2011, working out which column is quantity and which is extension, noticing that page four continues page three’s table without repeating the header: that is a reading problem. Reading is what models are for. The instant the numbers are extracted, they are handed to deterministic integer-cent code and the model is done.

Isolated instance. Microsoft Entra ID. During training, nothing leaves this desk as an outbound message without a recorded human approval. Leveling produces a recommendation. The estimator awards. The RFQ page is how the packages went out. This page is what you do when the replies come back.

Empty estimator office. Plans and a desk. No product chrome.

[ FAQ ]

Asked on the first call.

Is this GC-to-sub bid leveling?

No. This page levels the quotes a trade contractor’s vendors send. The hub for that category is AI bid leveling. A GC shopping subcontractors is a different product.

Does ArosBid change the vendor’s total?

No. It recomputes the itemized sum, shows the stated total, and surfaces the delta. The vendor conversation is yours.

What if the cheapest quote excluded the most?

Exclusions are lifted and priced as scope so you are comparing the same job, not the same cover number.

How does this relate to /ai-bid-leveling?

That page is the category hub. This page is the desk: leveling the quotes your vendors send, with the mismatch called out.

Is the $500,000 mismatch a customer story?

No. It is a labeled fictional demo scenario used on this site and in the walkthrough. Riverside Office Tower is the same.

Empty lobby corridor at night. No signage.

See a quote leveled against its own lines.

Book a live demo